Thursday, March 28, 2019

"The Republican Party will soon be known as the party of health care  you watch."


In George Orwell's 1984,  the term "wordfact" is used to describe a government pronouncement which is demonstrably false, yet accepted as true by an abject populace which has to swear allegiance not only to the beloved leader, but also to whatever comes out of his mouth. To such a state do we seem to be descending when the leader of the GOP asks us to believe that his party will generate any healthcare program at all -- let alone a serviceable one. 

Putting it charitably, anybody -- other than White House sycophants -- who would endorse that fiction simply hasn't been paying attention. The GOP is the party of providing no meaningful healthcare whatsoever. So fiercely have they opposed healthcare that Paul Krugman, in today's New York Times,  describes their hatred of it as "pathological." I prefer to think of it as a natural consequence of their chief credo -- that entitlement to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can be quantified in dollars: the more of them you have, the more entitled you become, and the less of them you have, the less deserving apparently, you must be of any good thing in life. From which it follows that to require the rich to help the poor is unutterably wrong -- "confiscatory," to use one of their favorite words.  Redistributing wealth downward in anathema to them, whereas redistributing upward is natural and right, the inevitable triumph of the stronger -- celebrated, they suppose, by Darwin.

Indeed, in today's corporate world, Cain's question, "am I my brother's keeper?" has developed a sinister answer, for our corporate masters do "keep" us, the way corporate  agribusiness keeps the sheep or cows it owns -- for their wool and their milk. And when we are no longer worth the shearing, or the milking, our owners dispose of us as efficiently as possible.

Thus our Republican overlords either approve of, or acquiesce in the abolition of ACA, and the gutting of Medicare and Social Security.  To them, it makes perfect sense: We are, from their point of view, simply not worth the money -- their money. For it is, increasingly, becoming all theirs.  According to an article in the Washington Post dated February of this year,  the top .1 percent own more than the bottom 80 percent.
Arguably, the super-rich already own our government. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals alone devotes three lobbyists to each Senator and Representative; doubtless the rest of Big Pharma is similarly devoted: One of the results is that Medicare is forbidden to negotiate drug prices. And the only way Obama could get ACA passed was  to agree to the parameters stipulated by the Medical/Industrial establishment. It was imperfect to begin with, and Trump's continual weakening of it made it even less satisfactory,  But we should be grateful for it, wobbly as it is, for 20 million people are insured by it, and it's the only thing standing between many thousands and certain death.  And if in the courts Trump succeeds where he couldn't in the legislature the results will be catastrophic.

And as if that weren't enough,  I've just received a post from Don McCanne, who quotes an economic report signed by Trump. Its bottom line is there is no reason why Healthcare cannot operate in a market governed by free choice  -- thus dismissing the work of eminent economists asserting that the unique features and conditions of healthcare make it impossible to function effectively in a free market system. (One of many reasons: To lower costs, the risk must be spread as wide as possible. Competing systems divide the pool and thus raise the rates. In addition, many people who need medical care are in no position to "shop  around" for the best value, nor have they the information to make an informed choice. This is no time for ideology. ) McCanne says with breathtaking understatement "we can conclude that our health care financing system is not in good hands. We have to do something about that."

Oh yes we do, friends, yes we do. We live in a country which is not only in thrall to corporate interests, it has seemingly become hypnotized by its propaganda.  There are people who actually believe that National Socialists (Nazis) and Democratic Socialists (Progressive Democrats) are equivalent. And there are people who think that taking the profit motive out of medicine is an attack on our Capitalistic system. If they mean the Capitalism of unrestrained and unregulated greed, they are right.

What can we do?  We must each of us contact our representatives -- on the federal level -- and insist that only Medicare For All will satisfy us, and that we don't buy the Trumpian free market bulls**t.  And on the State level we must contact our State Assembly Members and State Senators, and tell them that the New York Health Act is what we need and what we insist on. For more info on NYHA you can click on:
They've got everything from a brief, entertaining animation (see it!) longer videos with  more wonky explanations -- and everything in between. And it will have more suggestions about what you can DO.

And we must do all the above not only forcefully, but repeatedly. Don't rely on your friend or your neighbor to do it -- do it yourself.  Make time for it. Do it.  The revolution begins with us.

Everybody gets sick now and then. And when it's your turn, whose policies do you want  in place -- the Republicans (who really don't care what happens to you so long as their beloved free market is allowed to fly unconstrained) or the Democrats, whose guiding principle is EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO  HEALTHCARE -- NO MATTER WHAT THEIR STATION IN LIFE.

Tell others how you feel.

Dio

PS: If you'd like to leave a comment -- and I encourage you to do so -- simply click on the "number of comments" area, and share your thoughts in the "comment rectangle" that appears.

PPS: We know that there are plenty out there who have stories to tell -- stories of your trying to cope with our dysfunctional healthcare system. Trouble is, we don't know what these stories are! That's where you come in. If you have a story to tell, you can email me at indivisible12401@gmail.com. You can be as anonymous as you like. Thanks!






















5 comments:

  1. "The REPUBLICANS are the Party of George Orwell."
    This phrase should be broadcast across the Nation...
    Absolutely on the money !!!!
    "The REPUBLICANS are the Party of George Orwell."
    "THE REPUBLICANS ARE THE PARTY OF GEORGE ORWELL"
    PERFECT FIT !

    ReplyDelete
  2. BORROWING ELSEWHERE TO COMPLETE THE PICTURE:
    "Morlock Night"
    "In K. W. Jeter's novel Morlock Night, the Morlocks have stolen the Time Machine and used it to invade Victorian London. These Morlocks are much more formidable than those in The Time Machine - a clever, technological race with enough power to take over the entire world."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morlock

    Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ...The head MORLOCK?

    ReplyDelete

  3. Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. (born February 20, 1942) is an American politician serving as Kentucky’s senior United States Senator and as Senate Majority Leader.
    McConnell led opposition to stricter campaign finance laws, culminating in the Supreme Court ruling that partially overturned the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain-Feingold) in 2009.

    McConnell has been widely described as having engaged in obstructionism during Obama's presidency During Obama's presidency, minority obstruction reached all-time highs.
    According to Purdue University political scientist Bert A. Rockman, "pure party line voting has been evident now for some time ... but rarely has the tactic of "oppositionism" been so boldly stated as McConnell did.
    During the Obama presidency, McConnell worked to withhold Republican support for major presidential initiatives; made frequent use of the filibuster; and blocked an unprecedented number of Obama's judicial nominees, including Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. McConnell's refusal to allow Obama to seat a Supreme Court justice was described by political scientists and legal scholars as "unprecedented", a "culmination of this confrontational style," a "blatant abuse of constitutional norms," and a "classic example of constitutional hardball
    In 2016, after being approached by U.S. intelligence community officials, McConnell refused to give a bipartisan statement with President Obama warning Russia not to interfere in the upcoming election.

    During the Trump presidency, Senate Republicans, under McConnell's leadership, broke records on the number of judicial nominees confirmed; those nominees included Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, each of whom was confirmed to the Supreme Court. McConnell's approval rating, as reflected by both national and statewide poll results, is consistently among the lowest of all U.S. senators.

    The 2016 book Health Care Reform and American Politics by political scientists Lawrence Jacobs and Theda Skocpol describe McConnell's rationale as follows, "any compromises would undermine the Republican Party's effort to make big gains....[AND]...According to University of Texas legal scholar Sanford Levinson, McConnell learned that obstruction and Republican unity was the optimal way to ensure Republican gains in upcoming elections....

    Political scientists have referred to McConnell's use of the filibuster as "constitutional hardball", referring to the misuse of procedural tools in a way that undermines democracyYale University political scientist Jacob Hacker and University of California, Berkeley political scientist Paul Pierson describe McConnell as the major figure (along with Newt Gingrich) in transforming the Republican Party into a "party geared increasingly not to governing but to making governance impossible" ( FROM Hacker, Jacob; Pierson, Paul (2017 American Amnesia ).
    SOURCE:
    Excerpts from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_McConnell#cite_note-:9-29

    ReplyDelete
  4. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know, 3rd Edition 3rd Edition
    by Lawrence Jacobs (Author), Theda Skocpol 2015

    What does Affordable Care mean-and what comes next?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The 2016 book Health Care Reform and American Politics by political scientists Lawrence Jacobs and Theda Skocpol describe McConnell's rationale as follows, "any compromises would undermine the Republican Party's effort to make big gains....[AND]...According to University of Texas legal scholar Sanford Levinson, McConnell learned that obstruction and Republican unity was the optimal way to ensure Republican gains in upcoming elections....

    McConnell led efforts against President Barack Obama's health care reform, ensuring that no Republican senator supported Obama's 2009–2010 health care reform legislation.
    McConnell explained the reasoning behind withholding Republican support as, "It was absolutely critical that everybody be together because if the proponents of the bill were able to say it was bipartisan, it tended to convey to the public that this is O.K., they must have figured it out."
    McConnell voted against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly called ObamaCare or the Affordable Care Act) in December 2009, and he voted against the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. .In 2014, McConnell repeated his call for the full repeal of Obamacare and said that Kentucky should be allowed to keep the state's health insurance exchange website, Kynect, or set up a similar system.
    McConnell was part of the group of 13 senators drafting the Senate version of the AHCA behind a closed door. The Senator refused over 15 patient advocacy organization's requests to meet with his congressional staff to discuss the legislation. This included groups like the American Heart Association, March of Dimes, American Lung Association. and the American Diabetes Association.

    In 2015, both houses of Congress passed a bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
    It was vetoed by President Obama in January 2016

    After President Trump took office in January 2017, Senate Republicans, under McConnell's leadership, began to work on a plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. They faced opposition from both Democrats and moderate Republicans, who claimed that the bill would leave too many people uninsured, and more conservative Republicans, who protested that the bill kept too many of the ACA's regulation and spending increases, and was thus not a full repeal. Numerous attempts at repeal failed. On June 27, after a meeting with President Trump at the White House, McConnell signaled improvements for the repeal and replacement: "We're not quite there. But I think we've got a really good chance of getting there. It'll just take us a little bit longer.
    During a Rotary Club lunch on July 6, McConnell said, "If my side is unable to agree on an adequate replacement, then some kind of action with regard to the private health insurance market must occur."
    In October 2018, after the Trump administration joined Texas leaders and 19 other Republican state attorney generals in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the ACA, McConnell said it was no secret Republicans preferred to reboot their efforts in repealing the ACA and that he did not "fault the administration for trying to give us an opportunity to do this differently and to go in a different direction.
    SOURCE:
    Excerpts from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_McConnell#cite_note-:9-29

    ReplyDelete

WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL, NANCY? Will the April 30 Hearing on Medicare For All Be Little More Than a Farce? That may well be the case...